Welcome | + |
Lesson 1 |
Introduction |
|
Lesson 2 |
Facebook Group |
|
Lesson 3 |
Changing Your Password |
|
Bonus: ISC | + |
Lesson 1 |
ISC Map |
|
Lesson 2 |
ISC Map Analysis (Sarah Baker) |
|
Lesson 3 |
ISC Run (Sarah Baker and Skeptic) |
|
Lesson 4 |
ISC Run Analysis (Sarah Baker and Skeptic) |
|
Jumpers with Weaves | + |
Lesson 1 |
JWW Map |
|
Lesson 2 |
JWW Map Analysis (Jennifer Crank) |
|
Lesson 3 |
JWW Map Analysis (Sarah Baker) |
|
Lesson 4 |
Jack Daniels’ Run |
|
Lesson 5 |
Jack Daniels' Post Run Analysis |
|
Lesson 6 |
Bee's Run |
|
Lesson 7 |
Bee's Post Run Analysis |
|
Lesson 8 |
Skeptic's Run |
|
Lesson 9 |
Skeptic's Post Run Analysis |
|
Standard | + |
Lesson 1 |
Standard Map |
|
Lesson 2 |
Standard Map Analysis (Jennifer Crank) |
|
Lesson 3 |
Standard Map Analysis (Sarah Baker) |
|
Lesson 4 |
Skeptic’s Run |
|
Lesson 5 |
Skeptic’s Post Run Analysis |
|
Lesson 6 |
Jack Daniels' Run |
|
Lesson 7 |
Jack Daniels' Post Run Analysis |
|
Lesson 8 |
Bee’s Run |
|
Lesson 9 |
Bee’s Post Run Analysis |
|
Day 1 Wrap Up | + |
Lesson 1 |
Day 1 Wrap Up and Challengers Explained |
|
Hybrid | - |
Lesson 1 |
Hybrid Map |
|
Lesson 2 |
Hybrid Map Analysis (Sarah Baker) |
|
Lesson 3 |
Hybrid Map Analysis (Jennifer Crank) |
|
Lesson 4 |
Bee’s Run |
|
Lesson 5 |
Bee's Analysis |
|
Lesson 6 |
Skeptic’s Run |
|
Lesson 7 |
Skeptic’s Analysis |
|
Lesson 8 |
Jack Daniels’ Run |
|
Lesson 9 |
Jack Daniels’ Analysis |
|
Challengers | + |
Lesson 1 |
Challenger Map |
|
Lesson 2 |
Challenger Map Analysis (Sarah Baker) |
|
Lesson 3 |
Challenger Map Analysis (Jennifer Crank) |
|
Lesson 4 |
Bee's Run |
|
Lesson 5 |
Bee's Post Run Analysis |
|
Finals | + |
Lesson 1 |
Finals Map |
|
Lesson 2 |
Finals Map Analysis (Sarah Baker) |
|
Lesson 3 |
Finals Map Analysis (Jennifer Crank) |
|
Lesson 4 |
Jack Daniels' Run |
|
Lesson 5 |
Jack Daniels' Post Run Analysis |
|
Extras | + |
Lesson 1 |
Superstar Jenn |
|
Lesson 2 |
Jenn and Rio Win NAC at 12" |
|
Lesson 3 |
BDA Sponsored Athlete Betsey Lynch wins a Second NAC with Lark |
|
Wrap-Up | + |
Lesson 1 |
A Thank You to the Athletes |
|
Lesson 2 |
Survey |
|
I like your process of analysis – taking stock of the strengths and weaknesses of each dog and sort of pep talking to yourself about what you know they will nail and then having a plan for the rest.
For my system, turning into the dog at 14 that way is almost like a bypass cue that would mean DON’t take 15 and the dog would expect something more like heading back to 13 or even 10. It is great to see all the different cue “languages” (regional dialects? accents?) there are.
I appreciate the feedback regarding the discussion of my thought process. I 100% agree that knowing your dogs – their strengths, their weaknesses- is a big part of the game when it come to competition. In training, you get to work the weakness and train through failures. It a trial, you have to know what you have and adjust accordingly.
I too enjoy seeing different styles, but my favorite is hearing the different commands people use which often can be regional too. “Teeter” vs “SeeSaw” for example 😉
Yes I smirk a bit because you always seem to be so complete in saying the entire “teeter totter” phrase – at least in the BDA discussion videos.
My cue word for that obstacle is “BANG” cuz my first agility dog seemed to actually love to wham it down. One time, so hard it actually bumped him off. He turned around and got on his hind legs and caught the end before it could go back up, brought it down and perfectly 2o2o with a big happy grin. Wish I had that on video – he is gone now 🙂
I never even realized I say “teeter totter” when I discuss & analyze things. Hehe. It sounds so formal. I don’t think I say that when I teach live and I certainly don’t tell my dogs that cue.
“Bang” is actually Taylor and Sting’s cue too!! It started as a puppy with a generic “go bang it” as I talked to them and trained and now I just say “bag”.